How to handle Kafka consumer group offsets with Kannika

Handling consumer offsets during Kafka data restoration is a frequent challenge, particularly when maintaining original offsets is impossible. This challenge becomes critical in disaster recovery (DR) or cluster migration scenarios, where ensuring seamless reconnections for consuming applications can be complex.

Ideally, all consuming applications would be fully caught up at all times. After a restore, these consumers could simply connect to the high watermark of their topics and resume consumption without issue. However, this best-case situation is rare – especially in disaster scenarios where applications may have been disconnected or lagging. In some cases, such as low-traffic periods, this approach could be more feasible.

When consumers are not fully caught up, there are key strategies and tools available to support offset management.

‍

Key approaches to offset management

‍

1. Backup the __consumer_offsets topic: this topic keeps track of the latest committed offsets for all consumer groups within a Kafka cluster. Restoring this topic alongside your data allows you to pinpoint where each consumer group was last positioned. However, this method can be limited by certain managed Kafka services that don’t grant direct access to the __consumer_offsets topic, making it difficult to retrieve this crucial information.

‍

2. Use header-based seeking: Kannika Armory stores the original offset of each message during backup and can add a header with the offset from the source. By scanning these headers, consuming applications can seek the correct offset efficiently. This approach works well for applications that need precise offset control. However, the application must be able to read these headers and adjust accordingly to use this method effectively.

‍

3. Approximation via timestamp-based seeking: this practical approach leverages Kafka’s API to locate the nearest offset based on a specified timestamp. By monitoring metrics like consumer lag (e.g., through Prometheus or similar systems), you can estimate where consumers were at a particular moment and seek to that timestamp. Although this may involve minor reprocessing, it’s often a reasonable tradeoff that requires minimal setup in most environments.

‍

Offset mapping and automation challenges

Kannika is working on automating the offset mapping process to simplify workflows in scenarios where exact offset restoration is essential. This process involves three primary steps:

‍

1. Identify group, partition, and offset combinations: gather data from the __consumer_offsets topic to capture each consumer group’s specific partition and offset details before starting the restoration.

‍

2. Restore and track new offsets: during the restore, track the new offsets for these identified combos.

‍

3. Update the __consumer_offsets topic: after mapping the new offsets, the new CG offset can be pushed to the cluster, allowing consuming applications to reconnect seamlessly without disruption.

‍

The main challenge lies in ensuring that consuming applications remain temporarily disconnected during the offset update. If not, they might overlook or override the new offsets, risking data misalignment. Coordinating this process across large Kafka clusters with numerous consumer groups demands meticulous orchestration.

‍

Best practices for handling data recovery

To make sure your applications are prepared for disaster recovery, consider following these best practices:

• Monitoring: implement monitoring to keep an eye on lag, offsets, and other key performance metrics across your Kafka cluster. Tools like Prometheus or InfluxDB are popular for capturing this data.

• Backups: regularly back up your data – and if possible, include offset data backups to ensure a smooth recovery process.

• Documented recovery procedures: ensure that each application has clear documentation detailing the steps for reconnections and data recovery following a restore.

• Recovery drills: conduct routine tests of your disaster recovery procedures, and ensure that everyone on the team – not just one person – is equipped to carry them out. This approach distributes knowledge across the team and ensures that multiple members can assist in recovery.

‍

Conclusion

While fully caught-up consumers simplify the post-restore process, most real-world applications must be prepared for more complex scenarios. Timestamp-based seeking is an effective and pragmatic approach for many use cases. However, for applications that need precise offset control, Kannika’s automated offset mapping solution provides a reliable alternative. Consistent monitoring, well-documented recovery protocols, and regular drills are crucial to reduce downtime and data loss during disaster recovery.

‍